Question: What Is Muller V Oregon?
- 1 What did Muller vs Oregon do?
- 2 What is the significance of Muller v Oregon quizlet?
- 3 What did Muller v Oregon do to the workday?
- 4 What happened after Muller v Oregon?
- 5 Why was Muller v Oregon controversial?
- 6 Who was responsible for the case Muller v Oregon?
- 7 Why did the Muller v Oregon cause controversy quizlet?
- 8 Why is Muller v Oregon 1908 considered a landmark case quizlet?
- 9 What is Brown vs Board of Education quizlet?
- 10 Who was president during Muller v Oregon?
- 11 How does the Court’s decision in Muller differ from its decision in Lochner?
- 12 What was the significance of the Brandeis brief?
- 13 What was the immediate result of the Brandeis brief?
- 14 Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller give reasons for your answer?
What did Muller vs Oregon do?
Muller v. Oregon (1908) is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a state could limit the amount of hours a woman could work while not also limiting the hours of men. On September 4, 1905, he required a female employee to work more than ten hours in a single day.
What is the significance of Muller v Oregon quizlet?
A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women. The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health.
What did Muller v Oregon do to the workday?
On February 24, 1908, the Supreme Court decided Muller v. Oregon, unanimously upholding an Oregon law setting a 10-hour limit on the workday of women in factories and laundries. The Muller decision was a major victory for rising progressive lawyer Louis D. Brandeis because it upheld protective state regulations.
What happened after Muller v Oregon?
After Muller, many states passed wages and hours laws and other statutes regulating the conditions of work. However, in 1923, the Supreme Court ruled this legislation was unconstitutional in Adkins v. Oregon–overruled its 1923 decision in Adkins v.
Why was Muller v Oregon controversial?
In Muller vs. Oregon, a laundry owner argued that limiting women to a ten-hour work day was an unconstitutional violation of their right to choose their own employment. Due in large part to a unique legal brief by Louis Brandeis, the Supreme Court concluded that the states could limit the working hours of women.
Who was responsible for the case Muller v Oregon?
Background. Curt Muller, the owner of a laundry business, was convicted of violating Oregon labor laws by making a female employee work more than ten hours in a single day. Muller was fined $10.
Why did the Muller v Oregon cause controversy quizlet?
the Court struck down the minimum wage law as unconstitutional, arguing that it violated the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment.
Why is Muller v Oregon 1908 considered a landmark case quizlet?
This was a landmark Supreme Court decision because it relates to both sex discrimination and labor laws.
What is Brown vs Board of Education quizlet?
Brown Vs. board of education 1954. Supreme Court decision that overturned the Plessy vs. Ferguson decision (1896); led by Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Court ruled that “separate but equal” schools for blacks were inherently unequal and thus unconstitutional.
Who was president during Muller v Oregon?
He accepted and relished in cases that had social reform implications, such as Muller v. State of Oregon. Later, President Woodrow Wilson appointed him to the U.S. Supreme Court, where he served from 1916 to 1939. Brewer, David J.
How does the Court’s decision in Muller differ from its decision in Lochner?
In Lochner, the Court overturned a New York State law meant to regulate the hours that bakers could work, but three years later, in Muller, the justices upheld an Oregon regulation limiting the hours that women could work. If the procedure was fair, then the law would stand, regardless of its content.
What was the significance of the Brandeis brief?
The brief was significant in that it was the first one submitted to the Supreme Court that relied primarily on extra-legal data to prove its argument. Not only did the brief help Brandeis win the case but it also became a legal landmark in its own right.
What was the immediate result of the Brandeis brief?
The Brandeis brief changed the direction of the Supreme Court and of U.S. law. This strategy of combining legal argument with scientific evidence was later successfully used in Brown v. Board of Education to demonstrate the harmful psychological effects of segregated education on African-American children.
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller give reasons for your answer?
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller? Give reasons for your answer? Yes, Muller broke the law that was in place. Why was the Espionage Act passed?